Make Applying for Your Grants Simple

“Applications arrive via email with scattered attachments”

• Require all documents through the form with attachment fields
• Set up clear document naming in form instructions
• Create a checklist field to verify completeness

“Can't tell which submissions are complete”

• Use required fields for essential information
• Create a formula field that checks for completeness
• Set up a view that shows incomplete applications for follow-up

“Reviewers can't access application documents”

• All attachments are in Airtable. Share the base or specific views with reviewers
• Create reviewer-specific views with relevant applications and documents
• Use Airtable Interfaces for a clean reviewer experience

Can applicants save and return to complete their application?

Filla supports save-and-resume functionality. Applicants can save progress and return via a unique link. Partial submissions are visible in Airtable as drafts.

How do we handle multi-year grant applications?

Add conditional fields for multi-year requests showing year-by-year budgets and goals. Track the grant period in your Grants table with start and end dates.

Can reviewers score applications in the system?

Add scoring fields (number or single select) to your table. Create a reviewer interface or form for scoring. Rollups can calculate average scores across reviewers.

How do we communicate decisions to applicants?

Update the Status field when decisions are made. Set up automations to send decision emails. Use form prefill links for declined applicants to request feedback.

Can we track applications across multiple grant cycles?

Create a Grant Programs table with funding cycles. Link applications to specific cycles. Filter views by cycle to see current applications while keeping historical data.